Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TURNER COATINGS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TURNER COATINGS LLC in 19651-1/2 STUEBNER AIRLINE RD., SPRING, TX 77379 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 344913306.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turner Coatings LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turner Coatings LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TURNER COATINGS LLC
Site address
19651-1/2 STUEBNER AIRLINE RD.
City
SPRING
State
TX
ZIP
77379
Mailing
6046 FM 2920 #309, SPRING, TX 77379
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,422 · Current $4,453 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  On or about September 2, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing half-facepiece and full-facepiece respirators while painting products without the employer having an established written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4453.2
  • — Z (S) $7422

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.   On or about September 2, 2020, employees in the paint area were exposed to respiration hazards while wearing a 3M brand half-facepiece respirator without having been medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,937 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter  a.  On or about September 2, 2020, employees in the paint area were exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a half-facepiece respirator or full-facepiece respirator without having been fit tested before initial use.  b.  On or about September 2, 2020, an employee in the paint area was exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a half-facepiece respirator without having been fit tested annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5937

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function.  On or about September 2, 2020, employees were required to wear tight fitting 3M brand half-face and full-face respirators without having their facial hair trimmed or shaven so that the facial hair did not interfere with the face and mask sealing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,422 · Current $4,453 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).  On or about September 2, 2020, in the paint area where employees were exposed to chemical hazards while working with or around chemicals, such as but not limited to, methyl ethyl ketone, urethane converter 811, Interzinc 22, and Macropoxy 267, before a written hazard communication program had been developed and implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4453.2
  • — Z (S) $7422

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2020
Abate by
Jan 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about September 2, 2020, in the paint area where employees were exposed to chemical hazards while working with or around hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, methyl ethyl ketone, urethane converter 811, Interzinc 22, and Macropoxy 267, before being trained on the hazards of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Turner Coatings LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344913306.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.