OSHA Inspection: RC HOME SHOWCASE, INC.

Issued

Aug 20, 2021

Abate by

Sep 24, 2021

Penalty

Initial $438 · Current $438

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) On or about 3/30/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 1, issued on 03/4/2021, with an abatement due date of 03/30/2021.  b) On or about 3/30/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2, issued on 03/4/2021, with an abatement due date of 03/30/2021.

Issued

Mar 4, 2021

Abate by

Mar 30, 2021

Penalty

Initial $3,901 · Current $3,901

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:   a) On or about 9/11/2021, at the glazing area, the employer did not ensure that employees use eye protection while exposed to struck-by hazards from flying debris during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.  b) On or about 9/11/2021, at the fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that employees use eye protection while exposed to struck-by hazards from flying debris during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.   c) On or about 9/11/2021, at the machinery area, the employer did not ensure that employees use eye protection while exposed to struck-by hazards from flying debris during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.

Issued

Mar 4, 2021

Abate by

Mar 30, 2021

Penalty

Initial $3,901 · Current $3,901

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, or when the use of protective footwear will protect the affected employee from an electrical hazard, such as a static-discharge or electric-shock hazard, that remains after the employer takes other necessary protective measures:    a) On or about 9/11/2021, at the glazing area, the employer did not ensure that employees use foot protection while being exposed to struck-by hazards from lifting heavy doors during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.  b) On or about 9/11/2021, at the fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that employees use foot protection while being exposed to struck-by hazards from lifting heavy doors during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.  c) On or about 9/11/2021, at the machinery area, the employer did not ensure that employees use foot protection while being exposed to struck-by hazards from lifting heavy doors during their daily activities throughout the manufacturing process of the doors and windows.