BRIDGETON, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: SPECTRUM BRANDS - BRIDGETON
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SPECTRUM BRANDS - BRIDGETON in 13260 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE, BRIDGETON, MO 63044 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 344930631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPECTRUM BRANDS - BRIDGETON
- Site address
- 13260 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE
- City
- BRIDGETON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63044
- Mailing
- 13260 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE, BRIDGETON, MO 63044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311119
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 D02
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment: During preventative maintenance planned lubrication of the drive chain to the S2 packaging conveyor, after the guard was removed, the machine was not turned off for lubrication. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $9639
- · Z (S) $9639
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s): During preventative maintenance planned lubrication of the drive chain to the S2 packaging conveyor, after the guard was removed, the machine was not turned off and unplugged for lubrication. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: During maintenance, including, but not limited to, on the S1, S2, S3 lines, when performing work on pneumatically controlled equipment, such as zipper jaws, the isolating energy device was not locked out. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I C
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $8,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C): Where lockout was used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected: Lockout/tagout inspections have not been conducted annually between an inspector and each authorized employee, including inspection of specific energy control procedure(s) at a machine(s) to be locked out. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $8675
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: There was no certification that lockout/tagout inspections were conducted annually between an inspector and each authorized employee, including inspection of specific energy control procedure(s) at a machine(s) to be locked out. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (O) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,783 · Current $5,204 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. The S2 line lockout procedure did not include all machines that could and were worked on separately, such as on the packaging conveyor. There was no specific procedure for this particular machine, including how and where to shut it down and how to de-energize. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $5204
- · C (S) $5783
- · Z (S) $5783
1910.147 C04 II C
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them: The S2 line lockout procedure did not include all machines that could and were worked on separately, such as on the packaging conveyor. There was no specific procedure for this particular machine, including where to place a lock if needed. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II D
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control: The S2 line lockout procedure did not include specific steps for testing de-energization. "Verify the isolation of the equipment" is not specific. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $6,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Where electrical work has been performed on live electricity, such as testing voltages, personal protective equipment for arc flash and electrical shock hazards was not used and was not provided. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $6940
- · C (S) $7711
- · Z (S) $7711
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311119)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344930631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.