WESTLAKE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: EDGAR MOLINA ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDGAR MOLINA ROOFING in 1707 PLACID OAKS COURT, WESTLAKE, TX 76262 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344931597.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDGAR MOLINA ROOFING
- Site address
- 1707 PLACID OAKS COURT
- City
- WESTLAKE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76262
- Mailing
- 2916 BOMAR AVE, FORT WORTH, TX 76103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
General-duty citation text
CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about September 17, 2020 and at times prior thereto, at a workplace located at 1707 Placid Oaks Court, Westlake, Texas; the employer did not provide training to forklift operators to ensure employees are competent to operate the truck safely. The employees were exposed to fall and rollover hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1735
1926.453 A02
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(a)(2): Aerial lifts may be "field modified" for uses other than those intended by the manufacturer provided the modification has been certified in writing by the manufacturer or by any other equivalent entity, such as a nationally recognized testing laboratory, to be in conformity with all applicable provisions of ANSI A92.2-1969 and this section and to be at least as safe as the equipment was before modification; On or about September 17, 2020 and at times prior thereto, at a workplace located at 1707 Placid Oaks Court, Westlake, Texas; the employer attached a non-approved front-end loader and allowed an employee to work from it without a fall protection exposing the employee to fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt or harness was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. On or about September 17, 2020 and at times prior thereto, at a workplace located at 1707 Placid Oaks Court, Westlake, Texas; an employee working from a non-approved forklift attachment was not provided fall protection. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6-feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of '1926.502(k) developed and implemented; On or about September 17, 2020 and at times prior thereto, at a workplace located at 1707 Placid Oaks Court, Westlake, Texas; at the new residential construction site, employees were walking and working from the roof and not protected from falling more than 18 feet to the lower level by use of guardrail or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails was not extended at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about September 17, 2020 and at times prior thereto, at a workplace located at 1707 Placid Oaks Court, Westlake, Texas; at the new residential construction site, employees used ladders that were not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing to access the working area.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1735
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344931597.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.