NEW HAVEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: RENEW ONCE CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RENEW ONCE CONSTRUCTION LLC in 281 EDWARD STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344937909.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RENEW ONCE CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 281 EDWARD STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- 39 MEDOW STREET, NORWALK, CT 06854
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: The employee who was working below the roof and gutter repairs was not protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were installing and repairing sections of the roofing system were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The extension ladder used by employees to gain access to the roof did not have its side rails extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2313
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344937909.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.