MOORE, OK —
OSHA Inspection: CORTES MASONRY INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CORTES MASONRY INC. in 701 SW 17TH STREET, MOORE, OK 73160 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344968243.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORTES MASONRY INC.
- Site address
- 701 SW 17TH STREET
- City
- MOORE
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73160
- Mailing
- 612 TIERRA VISTA WAY, FORT WORTH, TX 76131
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.405 G02 II
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,931 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(ii): Type SJ, SJO, SJT, SJTO, S, SO, ST, or STO flexible cords were used without being durably marked on the surface with the type designation, size, and number of conductors. On or about October 7, 2020, at the front of Building B, surface markings for the type designation, size, and number of conductors were not visible on an orange electrical extension cord used to power a hand tool and exposed an employee to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1931
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. On or about October 7, 2020, outside on the ground near Building B, a yellow electrical extension cord lacked strain relief in that the outer jacket was pulled back from the male cord end. The yellow extension cord powered an orange extension cord that powered a hand tool. An employee was exposed to electrical hazards from a damaged extension cord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used. On or about October 7, 2020, at the front of Building B, an orange electrical extension cord had a torn outer jacket and a black covered conductor extended beyond the orange outer cord jacket. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using damaged electrical cords.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,931 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about October 7, 2020, at building B, the supported scaffold platform was more than 2 feet above the ground and portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for the following: a. Accessing 1st level scaffold platforms at the exterior side of the building. b. Accessing 1st level scaffold platforms at the roof. Employees doing stucco work were exposed to falls when accessing scaffold platforms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1931
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about October 7, 2020, at building B, the employer did not provide fall protection to employees walking on a sloped roof, to access a scaffold at the flat roof. This exposed the employees to falls greater than 6 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews. On or about October 7, 2020, at the north end of building B, the employer did not ensure that guardrail systems were installed along all open sides and ends of a 6 tier supported scaffold platform where employees worked. This exposed employees to falls greater than 10 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces was not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a toprail crossing point of two braces were not between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform. The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart. On or about October 7, 2020, at the north end of building B, a 6th tier supported scaffold platform lacked a toprail at a height between 38 inches and 48 inches above the work platform and exposed employees to falls greater than 10 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,575 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall. On or about October 7, 2020, at the north end of building B, at the 6 tier supported scaffold platform where employees worked there were no toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures to contain or deflect falling objects. Employees working at lower levels were exposed to falling objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2575
1926.501 C01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(c)(1): When employees were exposed to falling objects, the employer did not have each employee wear a hard hat and did not erect toeboards, screens, canopy structures or barricades to prevent objects from falling from higher levels. On or about October 7, 2020, at building B, the employer did not erect toeboards, screens, canopy structures or barricades to prevent objects from falling from higher levels including, but not limited to the following: a. Wall opening at the stair landing between the 4th and 3rd floors. b. Wall opening at the stair landing between the 3rd and 2nd floors. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from objects falling overhead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C12
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,931 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926. On or about October 7, 2020, at a stairwell of building B, the employer did not ensure unprotected sides of a stairway landing were provided with a guardrail system. A stair landing between the 2nd floor and the 1st floor did not have a guardrail at two unprotected sides and exposed employees to falls greater than 6 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1931
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344968243.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.