TOTOWA, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MIM PROPERTIES LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIM PROPERTIES LLC in 555 PREAKNESS AVE, TOTOWA, NJ 07502 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 344970801.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIM PROPERTIES LLC
- Site address
- 555 PREAKNESS AVE
- City
- TOTOWA
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07502
- Mailing
- 60 MONTCLAIR AVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Exterior Entrance, On the ground: An employee was exposed to head injuries while walking below a steel worker in gage in edge work activities. The employee was not protected by a hard hat or protective helmet, on or about 10/6/20. b) Exterior Front: An employees was exposed to head injuries while smoking in front of the building without the use of head protection, and employees were working above, on or about 10/6/20. c) Building Interior-4th floor: employees were expose to head injuries while a plumber was working on a 8 foot step ladder, and co-workers were standing underneath, on or about 10/6/20. d) Building Interior-4th floor: An employee was exposed to head injuries while working/walking without head protection and other employees were working above, on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,511 · Current $3,511
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) Building Exterior: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while cutting on a concrete wall with an angle grinder without eye and face protection, on or about 10/6/20. b) Building Exterior-Back of the building: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while jack hammering a concrete wall without eye and face protection, on or about 10/6/20. c) Building Interior: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a angle grinder without eye and face protection, on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3511
1926.303 B01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,511 · Current $3,511
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.303(b)(1): Grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of ANSI B7.1-1970, Safety Code for the Use, Care, and Protection of abrasive wheels, and paragraph (d) of this section. a) Building Back: An employee was exposed to face and eye injuries when the employee was using an angle grinder without the guard while cutting on a concrete wall, on or about 10/6/20 b) Building Interior 4th Floor: An employee was exposed to face and eye injuries when the employee was using an angle grinder without guard, on or about 10/6/20
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3511
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolding was not fully planked or decked: a) Building Interior Mezzanine: An employee was exposed to a 6 foot fall hazard while working on a scaffold that was not fully planked, on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,511 · Current $3,511
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. a) Building Exterior Back: Employees were using pipe scaffold frame to access the scaffold, exposing employees to a fall of approximately 6 feet to the ground surface, on or about 10/6/20
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3511
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a) Exterior of Building Front : An employee was exposed to a 40 foot fall hazard, while operating an articulated boom platform without personal fall arrest system, on or about 10/6/20. b) Exterior of Building Back : An employee was exposed to a 60 foot fall hazard, while operating an articulated boom platform without personal fall arrest system, on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) Building Interior 4th floor Back side: An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 60 feet while working at the edge without the use of personal fall arrest system, guardrail system, safety net system, on or about 10/6/20 c) Building Interior 4th Floor front and left side: Employees were exposed to fall hazard of approximately 60 feet while working/walking on the 4th floor where section on the floor were without a guardrail system, safety net system or other means of fall protection, on or about 10/6/20. b) Building Interior 5th Floor: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-12 feet while the mezzanine was not protected by guardrail system, safety net systems, or any other means of fall protection, on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.502 D11
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a) Building Exterior-5th floor Mezzanine: An employee was using a vertical Life line that was not protected against cuts or abrasions while tied around a steel beam, on or about 10/6/20
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.760 C01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(c)(1):Each employee working at the leading edge in a CDZ was not protected from fall hazards of more than two stories or 30 feet (9.1 m), whichever is less: Building Interior-5th floor Mezzanine: An employee was exposed to a 40 foot fall hazard while installing Q decking without the use of personal fall arrest system or any other means of fall protection, on or about, 10/6/20
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) Building Exterior: An employees were expose to a fall hazard while using a step ladder to access a pipe scaffold , on or bout 10/6/20
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1153 C02 II
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(2)(ii): Water was not applied at flow rates sufficient to minimize release of visible dust for tasks performed using wet methods: a) Building Exterior-back: The employer did not apply water to minimize the release of visible dust while dry cutting a concrete, the employee was exposed to silica dust while dry cutting the back wall with a handheld angle grinder, on or about 10/6/20. b) Building Exterior-back: The employer did not apply water to minimize the release of visible dust while dry cutting a concrete, the employee was exposed to silica dust while dry cutting the back wall with a Husqvarna K770 power cutter , on or about 10/6/20.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344970801.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.