LEESBURG, FL —
OSHA Inspection: AL'S WOOD FINISHING SHOP INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of AL'S WOOD FINISHING SHOP INC. in 703 THOMAS AVE SUITE 101, LEESBURG, FL 34748 (NAICS 811420). OSHA activity number 345005276.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AL'S WOOD FINISHING SHOP INC.
- Site address
- 703 THOMAS AVE SUITE 101
- City
- LEESBURG
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34748
- Mailing
- 703 THOMAS AVE SUITE 101, LEESBURG, FL 34748
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811420
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): The employer did not ensure that employees used protective eyewear when exposed to liquid chemicals: a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to health hazards, in that, the employer did not supply eye protection for employee use while performing cabinet painting using paint containing hexane, xylene and toluene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1735.2
- — Z (S) $2892
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,041 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, the employer did not have a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1041
- — Z (S) $1735
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards, in that, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employees ability to use a 3M Half Facepiece respirator before requiring the use while performing kitchen cabinet painting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards in that, the employer did not provide a fit test to employees wearing a 3M Half Facepiece respirator before requiring the use while performing kitchen cabinet painting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3):Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards, in that, the employer failed to provide training in the use of the required 3M Half Facepiece respirators to employees performing kitchen cabinet painting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,388 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. a. On or about 11/19/2020, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to health hazards in that, the employer did not provide gloves while performing kitchen cabinet painting refinishing duties with paint containing skin irritants such as hexane, toluene and xylene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1387.8
- — Z (S) $2313
More inspections at AL'S Wood Finishing Shop INC.
View AL'S Wood Finishing Shop INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811420)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345005276.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.