RYE, NH —
OSHA Inspection: ROWE CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROWE CONSTRUCTION in 168 OCEAN BLVD., RYE, NH 03870 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345006977.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROWE CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 168 OCEAN BLVD.
- City
- RYE
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03870
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 1821, SEABROOK, NH 03874
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $329 · Current $329
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item No(s). 1, 2, 3a, 3b and 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent July 9, 2021.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $329
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: a. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, the employer failed to perform frequent and regular inspections by a competent person to identify hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): Instance a. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to falls of over 8 feet while working from the second floor level, where fall protection was not provided or utilize to prevent the hazard. Instance b. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to fall hazards, where floor openings were not guarded or covered to prevent the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: a. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, the staircase in use by employees to access their work area was not provided with a handrail on either side of the staircase to prevent fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii):Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76cm) whichever is less were not equipped with one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, where the open sided staircase was not provided with stair railing to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. Site - On or about October 22, 2020, employees were exposed to fall hazards while attempting to navigate the eight-foot (Werner) stepladder to access the second floor level, where the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
More inspections at Rowe Construction
View Rowe Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345006977.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.