Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE PINEDA

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOSE PINEDA in 11535 POPPYSEED DR, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345011381.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Pineda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Pineda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE PINEDA
Site address
11535 POPPYSEED DR
City
PLAIN CITY
State
OH
ZIP
43064
Mailing
1655 CARSTARE DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2021
Abate by
Feb 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about November 5, 2020, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to address hazards such as fall protection during framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2021
Abate by
Feb 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or about November 5, 2020, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2021
Abate by
Feb 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or about November 5, 2020, the employer operated a pneumatic nail gun without the use of eye and face protection, thereby exposed himself to an eye and face hazard from flying particles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2021
Abate by
Feb 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about November 5, 2020, employees were performing framing work on a two story residential home without the use of fall protection, the employee was working on the roof at elevated heights of over 11 feet, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard.  b. On or about November 5, 2020, employees were performing framing work on a two story residential home without protecting the open edges, employees were working without a guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard of more than 11 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

View Jose Pineda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345011381.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.