Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VALMO ROOFING SOLUTIONS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VALMO ROOFING SOLUTIONS LLC in 9301 178TH ST., TINLEY PARK, IL 60487 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345013254.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valmo Roofing Solutions LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valmo Roofing Solutions LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9301 178TH ST.
City
TINLEY PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60487
Mailing
5257 S. PAULINA ST., CHICAGO, IL 60609
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, eight (8) feet ten (10) inches above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  b.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, nine (9) feet above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  c.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, seventeen (17) feet nine (9) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  d.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, eighteen (18) feet four (4) inches above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, a portable extension ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing an employee to hazards associated with falls from a maximum height of nine (9) feet.  b.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, a portable extension ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing an employee to hazards associated with falls from a maximum height of eighteen (18) feet four (4) inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about November 3, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345013254.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.