Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WAHLCO, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of WAHLCO, INC in 5830 STATE HIGHWAY V, JACKSON, MO 63755 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 345016604.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wahlco, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wahlco, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WAHLCO, INC
Site address
5830 STATE HIGHWAY V
City
JACKSON
State
MO
ZIP
63755
Mailing
5830 STATE HIGHWAY V, JACKSON, MO 63755
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $9,446
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C):Where lockout is used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected:  An annual lockout/tagout inspection was not conducted between an inspector and each authorized employee.  (Note: the purpose of the annual inspection is to ensure employees are conducting lockout/tagout according to standard requirements and specific procedures, and to identify any deficiencies that exist with the company lockout/tagout program and procedures.)  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $9446

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that the periodic inspections had been performed. The certification shall identify the machine or equipment on which the energy control procedure was being utilized, the date of the inspection, the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection:  There was no certification of an annual lockout/tagout inspection.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $9,446
29 CFR  1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:  a. A lock was not applied to the incline conveyor during cleaning/unjamming at the drive roller; the machine was not turned off and de-energized.  b. A lock was not applied to the grinder by one of the employees while cleaning the machine.   Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $9446

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified:  A singularly identified lock was not provided to all employees authorized to perform lockout/tagout work, such as for clearing a jam from the incline conveyor drive roller.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2020
Abate by
Jan 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:   Lockout/tagout procedures did not specifically identify how testing was to be conducted.   Procedures stated to "Test machine to verify machine is inoperable," which is not a specific procedure.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Wahlco, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345016604.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.