WYLIE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ANDRES ANGELES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANDRES ANGELES in 3212 AMBER WAVES LANE, WYLIE, TX 75098 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345021992.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANDRES ANGELES
- Site address
- 3212 AMBER WAVES LANE
- City
- WYLIE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75098
- Mailing
- 601 BELLAIRE DR APT 231, HURST, TX 76053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) On or about November 12, 2020 employees were performing framing operations and used pneumatic nail guns without the use of protective eyewear. Employees were exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) On or about November 12, 2020, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 10-feet to the ground below; (b) On or about November 12, 2020, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 20-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: (a) On November 12, 2020 and times prior thereto at the jobsite employees were performing framing operations and were exposed to the hazard of 10 to 20 -feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: (a) On or about November 12, 2020 and times prior thereto at the jobsite employees performing framing operations and were exposed to the hazard of 10 to 20-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: (a) On or about November 12, 2020, on the staircase of the residential home, the employer did not ensure that stairways having four or more risers rising more than 30 inches were equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge to protect employees from falling approximately 10- feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345021992.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.