Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNIVERSAL ORNAMENTS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of UNIVERSAL ORNAMENTS, INC. in 2305 BENNINGTON ST., HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 345032114.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Universal Ornaments, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Universal Ornaments, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2305 BENNINGTON ST.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77093
Mailing
2305 BENNINGTON ST., HOUSTON, TX 77093
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2021
Abate by
Feb 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $1,951 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about November 17, 2020, and at times prior thereto:  a.  In Building 1, where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating an Edwards hydraulic ironworker without guarding.  b.  In Building 2, where an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Birmingham lathe without guarding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950.5
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2021
Abate by
Feb 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $1,951 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):   On or about November 17, 2020, at times prior thereto,  in Building 2 Shop Area where an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards  when operating milling and drilling machines without point of operation guarding.  a.  Birmingham Vertical Milling Machine, Model BPV-3949C b.  PRM Milling and Drilling Machine, Model RL80RF311 c.  PRM Vertical Milling Machine, PR70950 d.  Birmingham Vertical Milling Machine, Model BPV-3949C
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950.5
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2021
Abate by
Feb 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $2,731 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   On or about November 17, 2020, in Building 1 in the center area where employees were exposed to an electrical shock hazard when performing work around an energized 230 VDC electrical cord with a broken housing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2730.5
  • — Z (S) $5461

1910.304 F01 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2021
Abate by
Mar 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,340 · Current $1,170 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel:  On or about November 17, 2020, and at times prior thereto, in the Building 2 Shop Area where employees were exposed to trip hazards when accessing electrical panels that were not readily accessible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1170
  • — Z (S) $2340

1910.178 L01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2021
Abate by
Feb 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck   On or about November 17, 2020, at times prior thereto, employees were allowed to operate forklifts prior to  having completed training consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345032114.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.