Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MONTEFIORE NEW ROCHELLE HOSPITAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MONTEFIORE NEW ROCHELLE HOSPITAL in 16 GUION PLACE, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 345045520.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Montefiore NEW Rochelle Hospital — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Montefiore NEW Rochelle Hospital is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16 GUION PLACE
City
NEW ROCHELLE
State
NY
ZIP
10801
Mailing
111 EAST 210 STREET, BRONX, NY 10467
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622110
Employees
1079
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2021
Abate by
Jul 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $13,653
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Emergency Department:  On or about 12/1/20 and thereafter, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a respirator before requiring the use.  The employer required a registered nurse to wear a N95 respirator while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.    b) 5 Joyce:  On or about 12/1/20 and thereafter, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a respirator before requiring the use.  The employer required registered nurses to wear N95 respirators while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2021
Abate by
Jul 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a)   Emergency Department:   On or about 12/30/20, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8210 - N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.    b) ICU:  On or about 11/28/20 and thereafter, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8210R- N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.  c) ICU:  On or about  1/13/21 to 1/21/21, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 9205 - N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit until on or about 1/21/21. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.  d) ICU:  On or about  1/14/21 to 1/22/21, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8110S - N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit until on or about 1/22/21. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.   e)  PCU:   On or about  11/28/20 to 12/30/20,  the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8210(plus type) - N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit until on or about 12/30/20. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.   f)  PCU:   On or about  12/15/20 to 2/24/21, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8210R - N95 respirator after a registered nurse  failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit until 2/24/21. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.    g)   PCU:  On or about  11/28/20 and thereafter, the employer permitted the use of a 3M 8110S - N95 respirator after a registered nurse failed the fit test and was not retested with other respirator make(s), model(s), or size(s) to assure a good fit. The employer required the employee to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 32 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2021
Abate by
Jul 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator or annually refitted:  a)   Emergency Department:   On or about 11/28/20 and thereafter, the employer did not provide a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators.  The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.  b)   5 Joyce:   On or about 11/28/20 and thereafter, the employer did not provide a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators.  The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.  c)  ICU:  On or about 11/28/20 and thereafter, the employer did not provide a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators.  The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.  d)   PCU:  On or about 11/28/20 and thereafter,  the employer did not provide a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators.  The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while providing care to suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19 patients.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.32 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1079 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2021
Abate by
Jul 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1904.32(b)(3):  A company executive did not examine the OSHA 300 Log to ensure that the annual summary was correct and complete prior to certifying the annual summary.   a)  Entire Facility:   On or about 1/21/21, the person who completed the 2020 OSHA-300A Annual Summary did not examine the 2020 OSHA-300 log to ensure it was correct and complete prior to certifying the annual summary in that  1.  Case Numbers 15, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 35, 37 and 50 were incorrectly identified as injuries and not illnesses which resulted in the incorrect number of injuries and illnesses being documented on the 20202 OSHA 300A;   and 2. The  total number of days away from work was not accurately calculated which resulted in the incorrect number of days away  from work being documented on the 2020 OSHA 300A.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 70 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2021
Abate by
Jul 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(m)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not establish a record of the qualitative and quantitative fit tests administered to an employee which included the type of fit test performed:   (a) Emergency Department, 5 Joyce, ICU and PCU:   On or about 11/23/20 and thereafter, the employer required registered nurses to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARs-CoV-2 virus and did not establish fit test records  which included the type of fit test and the name of the test agent used for all registered nurses who received fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Montefiore NEW Rochelle Hospital's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345045520.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.