BRIGHTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: FGS CONSTRUCTION INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FGS CONSTRUCTION INC. in 64 LANGLEY ROAD, BRIGHTON, MA 02135 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345045579.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FGS CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 64 LANGLEY ROAD
- City
- BRIGHTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02135
- Mailing
- 1414 CONCORD STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,984 · Current $2,984
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Location: Job site Employees using nail guns and circular saws did not wear safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2984
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: Jobsite Employees were not protected against falls of six feet or more. Instance A: A floor opening on the first floor was not fully guarded. Instance B: A floor opening on the second floor was unguarded exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet. Instance C: A second floor window opening was not fully guarded. Instance D: Employees working on the attic floor joists were not protected against falls up to 24 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: Job site Employees had not been trained in fall hazards and fall protection measures.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii):Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge. Location: Stairs leading from the first to the second floor. The stairway between the first and second floor lacked a stair rail.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345045579.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.