Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MATTHEW J NISLEY DBA NISLEY'S QUALITY COATINGS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MATTHEW J NISLEY DBA NISLEY'S QUALITY COATINGS in 127 PLEASANT ST., HILLSBORO, IL 62049 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345075618.

Watch Matthew J Nisley DBA Nisley'S Quality Coatings — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Matthew J Nisley DBA Nisley'S Quality Coatings is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
127 PLEASANT ST.
City
HILLSBORO
State
IL
ZIP
62049
Mailing
574 E. COUNTY ROAD 1250 N., TUSCOLA, IL 61953
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2021
Abate by
Sep 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $361 · Current $361
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021,  the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b)  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. c)  For Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $361

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 18, 2021
Abate by
Sep 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $361 · Current $361
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 2a, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b ) For Citation 1, Item 2b, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. c) For Citation 2, Item 1,  issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. d)  For Citation 2, Item 2, issued on 6/16/2021 with an abatement date of 7/21/2021, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $361

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,218 · Current $3,218
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from electrical shock and fall from heights hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3218

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,505 · Current $4,505
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that circuits were de-energized or insulated when employees worked to install roofing material in close proximity to a 120/208v triplex service drop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4505

1926.416 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit.  On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that the electrical lines from the service drop were located so that employees working to install roofing material on the roof would not come in contact with electrical power circuit from a 120/208v triplex service drop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,218 · Current $3,218
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not provide fall protection training to enable workers to recognize and control the fall hazards at their worksite while performing commercial construction.  The workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately twelve (12) feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3218

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,218 · Current $3,218
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:    On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not train the employees to properly construct and place a ladder so it extends three (3) rungs or thirty-six (36) inches above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3218

1926.501 B11

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,011 · Current $9,011
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): "Steep roofs." Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not ensure appropriate fall protection was implemented for employees performing commercial roofing operations on a 5:12 pitch roof.  The employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately twelve (12) feet.  The employer (Matt Nisley doing business as Nisley's Quality Coatings) was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1316092, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 7/26/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 3201 Douglas Woods, Urbana, IL, 61802.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $9011

1926.1053 B01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2021
Abate by
Jul 21, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,437 · Current $6,437
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access:   On or about 12/21/2020, the employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing.  Workers performing commercial construction were exposed to falling approximately twelve (12) feet while using a little giant type ladder to ascend/descend from the ground level to the roof.   The employer (Matt Nisley doing business as Nisley's Quality Coatings)  was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard. 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1316092, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 7/26/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 3201 Douglas Woods, Urbana, IL, 61802.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $6437

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345075618.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.