WESTBROOK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MAKARIOS ROOFING & SIDING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAKARIOS ROOFING & SIDING in 167 OLD KELSEY POINT ROAD, WESTBROOK, CT 06498 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345086607.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAKARIOS ROOFING & SIDING
- Site address
- 167 OLD KELSEY POINT ROAD
- City
- WESTBROOK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06498
- Mailing
- 106 JONES AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 24, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $361 · Current $361
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 167 Old Kelsey Point Road, Westbrook, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 02, Item 001 and Citation 02, Item 002 with a final order date of 4/27/2021 was not received within 10 calendar days (by May 2, 2021) following the abatement due date (4/22/2021).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $361
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,931 · Current $1,931
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employee(s) working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Job site: Employees were exposed to head injuries from falling and flying debris from the workers stripping the asphalt roof shingles above.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1931
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,575 · Current $2,575
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2575
1926.307 D01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,736 · Current $2,736
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section: Note: Pulleys serving as balance wheels (e.g., punch presses) on which the point of contact between belt and pulley is more than 6 feet 6 inches (1.976 m) from the floor or platform may be guarded with a disk covering the spokes. Jobsite: The pulley on the wheelbarrow air compressor was not guarded, exposing the employees to an ingoing nip point.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2736
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $3,218
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt shingles from the ladder jack scaffolds were not protected from fall hazards by the use of personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,575 · Current $2,575
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1):The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Jobsite: The employees who were working from the ladder jack scaffolds without fall protection were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2575
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $3,218
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The side rails of the extension ladder used by employees to gain access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,575 · Current $2,575
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: The employees using the extension ladder to access the roof were not trained in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2575
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $6,437 · Current $6,437
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt shingles on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems. Makarios Home Improvement LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number1464338, Citation Number 1, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on August 14, 2020, with respect to a workplace located at 179 Greib Road Wallingford, CT 06492.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $6437
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,149 · Current $5,149
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. Makarios Home Improvement LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number1464338, Citation Number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on August 14, 2020, with respect to a workplace located at 179 Greib Road Wallingford, CT 06492.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $5149
More inspections at Makarios Roofing & Siding
View Makarios Roofing & Siding's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345086607.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.