OLD GREENWICH, CT —
OSHA Inspection: KERIGAN'S ROOFING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KERIGAN'S ROOFING, INC. in 16 WEBB AVENUE, OLD GREENWICH, CT 06870 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345086714.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KERIGAN'S ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 16 WEBB AVENUE
- City
- OLD GREENWICH
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06870
- Mailing
- 35 VILLA AVE., FAIRFIELD, CT 06825
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $1,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1550
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $1,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt shingles from the ladder jack scaffolds were not protected from fall hazards by the use of personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1550
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.452 K02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(2): All ladders used to support ladder jack scaffolds did not meet the requirements of subpart X of this part -- Stairways and Ladders, except that job-made ladders were not allowed to be used to support ladder jack scaffolds. Jobsite: The two (2) ladders that were used to support the ladder jack scaffold were not set at a one (1) to four (4) ratio, exposing the employees installing roofing shingles to the hazard of collapse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt shingles from the ladder jack scaffolds without fall protection were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt shingles on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1900
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Kerigan'S Roofing, INC.
View Kerigan'S Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345086714.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.