FRANKLIN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MAYOLA LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MAYOLA LLC in 9744A SOUTH 31 STREET, FRANKLIN, WI 53132 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345089155.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAYOLA LLC
- Site address
- 9744A SOUTH 31 STREET
- City
- FRANKLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53132
- Mailing
- 9744A SOUTH 31 STREET, FRANKLIN, WI 53132
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $329 · Current $329
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $329
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): Specified exposure control methods. For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section: (a) On or about October 7, 2020, and days prior, two employees were observed and photographed performing tuckpointing work on a chimney, which produced visible dust clouds, potentially exposing employees to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103): (a) On or about October 7, 2020, and days prior, employees were observed performing tuckpointing work on a chimney, producing visible dust clouds, and without respiratory protection in use. The company did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1153 E02
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(2): Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer did not institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134: (a) On or about October 7, 2020, and days prior, employees were observed performing tuckpointing work on a chimney, producing visible dust clouds, and without respiratory protection in use. The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about October 7, 2020, and days prior, employees were observed performing tuckpointing work on a chimney, producing visible dust clouds, and without respiratory protection in use. The company did not provide a medical evaluation to determine employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) On or about October 7, 2020, and days prior, employees were observed performing tuckpointing work on a chimney, producing visible dust clouds, and without respiratory protection in use. The employer did not fit testing employees prior to using respiratory protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Mayola LLC
View Mayola LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345089155.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.