Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: DE CASTRO FRAMING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DE CASTRO FRAMING, LLC in 123 ROWE HILL RD., HARTFORD, NY 12838 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345093553.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DE Castro Framing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DE Castro Framing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
123 ROWE HILL RD.
City
HARTFORD
State
NY
ZIP
12838
Mailing
2204 SHEARWATER CIR., COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48390
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2021
Abate by
Feb 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $2,106 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Southwest end of building - On or about January 11, 2021 and at times prior thereto, employees were working on the inside of the building, underneath the framers, without having hard hats on.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2106
  • · Z (S) $3511

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2021
Abate by
Feb 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,404 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a) Southwest corner of building - On or about January 11, 2021 and at times prior thereto, employees were framing the roof and installing trusses using pneumatic nail guns and circular saws without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1404
  • · Z (S) $2341

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2021
Abate by
Feb 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $2,459 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a) Southwest side of building - On or about January 11, 2021 and at times prior thereto, employees were framing the roof of the building and installing trusses without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2459
  • · Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2021
Abate by
Feb 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,404 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Southwest corner of building - On or about January 11, 2021 and at times prior thereto, employees were accessing the 14' high roof with a 24' extension ladder and the side rails did not extend the required 3' above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1404
  • · Z (S) $2341

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2021
Abate by
Feb 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  a) Work site - On or about January 11, 2021 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have written certification to verify employees training in fall protection hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345093553.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.