WINDHAM, NH —
OSHA Inspection: FVF FERE VENNY FRAMING INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FVF FERE VENNY FRAMING INC. in 10 CHESTNUT STREET, WINDHAM, NH 03087 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345097232.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FVF FERE VENNY FRAMING INC.
- Site address
- 10 CHESTNUT STREET
- City
- WINDHAM
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03087
- Mailing
- 9 ARCADIA AVENUE, FITCHBURG, MA 01420
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- Employees were not protected from multiple fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to identify and abate hazards at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury: Site- On or about January 11, 2021, employees framing walls at a residential construction site were not protected from a struck by hazard where the employer did instruct each employee on the crew in the proper technique and equipment to use while manually lifting walls into place. Two employees were struck by a wood framed wall when it fell over because it was not secured with jacks while lifting into place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site, Second floor- Employees working from the second floor deck were not protected from a fall of approximately 15 feet where guardrails were not installed along the unprotected floor edges and window openings. The employer did not require the use of personal fall arrest equipment where guardrails were not installed on the second floor. b. Site, first floor- Employees working from the first floor were not protected from a fall of approximately 10 feet where the stair opening to the basement did not have guardrails or a cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards while framing a house were not provided with fall protection from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where there was a break in elevation of approximately 4 feet from the exterior building grade to the first floor and a stairway or ladder was not provided at all personnel points of access.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where there was a break in elevation of approximately 4 feet from the exterior building grade to the first floor. A six foot Werner fiberglass step ladder was set on ice and used in the closed position to access one of the two first floor access points.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where there was a break in elevation of approximately 4 feet from the exterior building grade to the first floor. A six foot Werner fiberglass step ladder was set on ice and used in the closed position to access one of the two first floor access points.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees accessing the second floor were not protected from a fall hazard where aluminum extension ladder used for access only extended approximately 12 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345097232.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.