BROWNSVILLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BROWNSVILLE GULFSIDE WAREHOUSE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BROWNSVILLE GULFSIDE WAREHOUSE, INC. in 400 RL OSTOS ROAD, BROWNSVILLE, TX 78521 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 345102925.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BROWNSVILLE GULFSIDE WAREHOUSE, INC.
- Site address
- 400 RL OSTOS ROAD
- City
- BROWNSVILLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78521
- Mailing
- 3500 RL OSTOS ROAD, BROWNSVILLE, TX 78521
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493110
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $8192.00 · Current $8192.00
P104
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: On or about January 14, 2021, at this facility, employees exposed to respiratory hazards, such as but not limited to, portland cement while moving inventory in and out of warehouses. The employer did not conduct air monitoring to see if employees were over permissible exposure limits for time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $8192
- — Z (S) $8192
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about January 14, 2021, at this facility, an employee involved in moving sacks of cement wore a respirator. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to an employee's use of a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about January 14, 2021, at this facility, an employee involved in moving sacks of cement a wore a respirator. The employer did not provide an annual fit-test and/or initial fit-test for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about January 14, 2021, the employer did not provide respirator training for employees who wear a respirator when working.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $6827.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: On or about January 14, 2021, employees operated forklifts and had not received the required training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2500
- — Z (S) $6827
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: On or about January 14, 2021, at this location, employees used forklifts to move products in and out of warehouses. The employer did not have written certification that a hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $767.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about January 14, 2021, employees moved around cement using forklifts. The employees did not have hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $767
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493110)
PORTSMOUTH, VA—2026-07-15
DACS INC
WEST CHESTER, OH—2026-07-14
CRESCENT PARK CORPORATION
WEYMOUTH, MA—2026-07-14
SPEEDX
DUNDALK, MD—2026-07-09
WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN, INC.
ROCK HILL, SC—2026-07-08
77566 - WEST MARINE INC
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345102925.