Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BALDWIN POLE AND PILING COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BALDWIN POLE AND PILING COMPANY, INC. in 1101 HIGHWAY 31 N, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507 (NAICS 321114). OSHA activity number 345110266.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baldwin Pole and Piling Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baldwin Pole and Piling Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1101 HIGHWAY 31 N
City
BAY MINETTE
State
AL
ZIP
36507
Mailing
P.O. BOX 758, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321114
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) peeler area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in the peeler area to noise at levels of 141.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 93.0 dBA) which is 3.04 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 478 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.    b) classifying area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in classifying area to noise at levels of 114.1% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 90.9 dBA) which is 2.28 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 476 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5461

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    a) Peeler area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in the peeler area to noise at levels of 141.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 93.0 dBA) which is 3.04 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 478 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not make audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.    b) Classifying area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in classifying area to noise at levels of 114.1% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 90.9 dBA) which is 2.28 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 476 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not make audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:   a) Peeler area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in the peeler area to noise at levels of 141.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 93.0 dBA) which is 3.04 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 478 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not provide training on the effects of noise as part of a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.    b) Classifying area; on February 2, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed the employees operating in classifying area to noise at levels of 114.1% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 90.9 dBA) which is 2.28 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA).  Results were calculated for a 476 minutes sampling period.  The employer did not provide training on the effects of noise as part of a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i):Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  a) pole treatment area office beside main office; on January 20, 2021 and times prior the employer exposed  employees to chemical hazards by allowing employees to store their assigned respirators by laying the respirators on the bench in office with no protection from contamination and deformation of full facepiece.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Baldwin Pole and Piling Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345110266.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.