Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AB CUSTOM WOODWORK, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AB CUSTOM WOODWORK, LLC in 85 CONSTANT COMMENT WAY, FAIRFIELD, CT 06828 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 345115182.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AB Custom Woodwork, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AB Custom Woodwork, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
85 CONSTANT COMMENT WAY
City
FAIRFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06828
Mailing
238 ROSEVIEW TERRACE, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,405 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(9):A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  WORKSHOP:  The spray paint booth, unknown identification was not maintained a clear space of not less than three (3') feet on the right and left sides of the booth at all times. 	 ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,405 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard worksite-specific respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear 3M 60923 half-face air purifying respirators , 3M full-face air purifying respirators, N95 (BYD and/or AllPro) filtering face piece respirators, and Base Camp N99 respirators worn by employees during tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting and woodworking.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  WORKSHOP:The employees, required to wear the 3M 60923 half-face air purifying respirators, 3M full-face air purifying respirators, N95 (BYD and/or AllPro) and N99 Base Camp filtering facepiece respirators  during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting and woodworking had not been medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to wear the respirators prior to fit testing or required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   WORKSHOP:  The employer did not ensure that the employees required to wear the 3M 60923 half-face air purifying respirators, 3M  full-face air purifying respirators, N95 (BYD and/or AllPro), and the N99 Base Camp filtering facepiece respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting and woodworking were fit-tested prior to initial wear of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(1)(i):Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:  WORKSHOP: The 3M 60923 half face piece respirator and 3M full face air purifying respirator worn by the employees during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting were not cleaned and disinfected on the inside and outside the surfaces of the respirator.  ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i):Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  WORKSHOP: The employer had not ensured the employee who was required to wear the 3M60923 half face air purifying respirator and 3M full face air purifying respirator during the task, such as (but not limited to) spray painting proper storage of the respirators to protect the respirators from damage and contamination.  ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1):The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators:  WORKSHOP: The employer did not provide effective training to the employees required to wear the 3M60923 half face air purifying respirator, 3M full face air purifying respirator, N95 (BYD and/or AllPro), and the Base Camp N99 filtering face piece respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to)  spray painting and woodworking.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,405 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS), where the employee was required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) water based paints, Tech Thinner, benzarid, Clorox wipes, Cavi wipes, Besafe hand sanitizer, and lysol spray disinfectant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  WORKSHOP:  The employer did not provide training and information to the employee on the hazard communication program  including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS) for the employees required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) water based paints, Tech Thinner, benzarid, Chloroz wipes, Cavi wipes, Besafe hand sanitizer, and lysol spray disinfectant.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:   WORKSHOP:  The employer did not  verify, through a written certification,  a workplace hazard assessment to determine the necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345115182.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.