BURLINGTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ACKERMAN CARPENTRY CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ACKERMAN CARPENTRY CORP in 86 LEXINGTON ST, BURLINGTON, MA 01803 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345132633.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ACKERMAN CARPENTRY CORP
- Site address
- 86 LEXINGTON ST
- City
- BURLINGTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01803
- Mailing
- 36 TEXAS RD., WESTFORD, MA 01886
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 6, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment that were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that they were exposed to ejection and crushing hazards while operating rough terrain powered industrial truck without wearing a seatbelt: On or about January 21, 2021, and at times prior, employees were exposed to ejection and crushing hazards while operating the Lull model 644B-37 rough terrain forklift which was equipped with an unused/inoperative seatbelt.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2341
- — Z (S) $2341
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,755 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d): Jobsite: The employee(s) operating the Lull, model 644B-37 was not trained was not trained, evaluated, or certified as required by OSHA standards
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1755
- — Z (S) $1755
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,755 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: Jobsite: The outer sheathing of the black multi-outlet extension cord, used by employees to power an air compressor, was torn from the multi-outlet cord end exposing employees to electric shock/burns and/or electrocution.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $1755
- — Z (S) $1755
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: a) Employees, engaged in framing work at the edge of the second-floor deck, above the garage, were not protected from falls of approximately 9ft 2-inches to grade. b. Employees, walking-working on the second floor, in the vicinity of the stair opening, were exposed to falls of approximately 9 ft posed by open, unprotected floor holes. c) Employees, walking-working on the second-floor, were exposed to falls of approximately 12-ft to grade posed by unguarded window openings at the rear of the home. d) Employees, walking/working in the garage area, were exposed to falls of over 7-ft posed by the unguarded floor opening to the basement.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $4096
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,511 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Jobsite: a) Employees accessing the first floor via the garage were not provided with stairs, a ladder, or a ramp where a break in elevation between the two surfaces was 23-inches. b) Employees accessing the first floor via the front entrance were not provided with stairs, a ladder, or a ramp where a break in elevation between the two surfaces was 30-inches.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $3511
- — Z (S) $3511
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345132633.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.