Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BELLO CONSTRUCTION & HOME IMPROVEMENT

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BELLO CONSTRUCTION & HOME IMPROVEMENT in 1090 KING STREET, DENVER, CO 80204 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345136410.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bello Construction & Home Improvement — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bello Construction & Home Improvement is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1090 KING STREET
City
DENVER
State
CO
ZIP
80204
Mailing
359 STUART STREET, DENVER, CO 80219
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2021
Abate by
Apr 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(6)(i):  Snaphooks shall not be engaged directly to webbing, rope, or wire rope unless the snaphook is a locking type and designed for the connection:  (a)  Bello Construction & Home Improvement, at 1090 King Street, Denver, CO: On 2/4/2021, a snaphook was engaged directly to a lifeline when not designed for the connection.  Employees were laying out the exterior wall of a three story multi-unit residence.  Employees utilized personal fall arrest systems.  The lifeline used by an employee was wrapped around interior top plate framing, with the lifeline's snaphook connected to the lifeline rope, aka "choked".  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate twenty foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2021
Abate by
Apr 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached:   (a)  Bello Construction & Home Improvement, at 1090 King Street, Denver, CO: On 2/4/2021 the employer did not ensure that an anchorage used for attachment for a personal fall arrest equipment was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached.  Employees were laying out the exterior wall of a three story multi-unit residence.  Employees utilized personal fall arrest systems.  The personal fall arrest system used by an employee included an anchorage where a lifeline was wrapped around interior top plate framing, with the lifeline's snaphook connected to the lifeline rope, aka "choked".  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate twenty foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2021
Abate by
Apr 7, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   (a)  Bello Construction & Home Improvement, at 1090 King Street, Denver, CO: On 2/4/2021 the employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level.  Employees were laying out the exterior wall of a three story multi-unit residence.  Employees utilized personal fall arrest systems.  The personal fall arrest system was rigged with excessive slack in the lifeline.  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate twenty foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345136410.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.