Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RHINO LININGS OF KERRVILLE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RHINO LININGS OF KERRVILLE in 82 CORONADO DRIVE NORTH, KERRVILLE, TX 78028 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 345145056.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rhino Linings of Kerrville — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rhino Linings of Kerrville is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
82 CORONADO DRIVE NORTH
City
KERRVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78028
Mailing
82 CORONADO DRIVE NORTH, KERRVILLE, TX 78028
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811198
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances C326

29 CFR  1910.132(e): The employer did not remove from service defective or damaged personal protective equipment.   On or about February 11, 2021, three employees used damaged and punctured full-body Tyvek suits as protection from airborne 4,4'-Diphenylmethane Diisocyante (MDI) while spraying truck bed liners, exposing the employees to the hazard of contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0040

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:  At times prior to February 11, 2021,  two employees in a spray room were using tight-fitting half face respirators to protect against inhalation of acetone vapors without a respirator cartridge change schedule, exposing the employees to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $1,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0040C326

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about February 11, 2021, three employees were required to wear half face tight-fitting respirators while manually applying acetone and full face tight-fitting respirators while spraying 4,4'-Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) onto truck beds without being fit tested, exposing the employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $4096

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0040

29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about February 11, 2021, two employees wearing half face tight-fitting respirators while manually applying acetone had facial hair that interfered with a proper seal, exposing the employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $1,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances C326

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  On or about February 11, 2021, two employees in a spray room were spraying 4,4'-Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) on truck beds as a liner product without having an evaluation or estimate of their exposures to the chemical, exposing the employees to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $4096

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $1,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0040C326

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about February 11, 2021, two employees in a spray room were required to wear full face tight-fitting respirators while spraying 4,4'-Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) on truck beds without having received medical evaluations, exposing the employees to the hazards of increased physiological burden and aggravation of a cardiac or pulmonary disorder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $4096

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $1,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0040C326

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): The employer did not train employees on the physical, health, simple asphyxiation, combustible dust, and pyrophoric gas hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area:  On or about February 11, 2021, two employees were spraying 4,4'-Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and manually applying acetone to truck beds without having received training on the hazards of the chemicals they worked with, exposing the employees to the hazard of contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $4096

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345145056.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.