Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROEMER INDUSTRIES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROEMER INDUSTRIES in 1555 MASURY RD, MASURY, OH 44438 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 345156152.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roemer Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roemer Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROEMER INDUSTRIES
Site address
1555 MASURY RD
City
MASURY
State
OH
ZIP
44438
Mailing
1555 MASURY RD, MASURY, OH 44438
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,963 · Current $2,785 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a. On or about February 19, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employees in the etching room, who were exposed to corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to, hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, sodium hypochlorite, and ferric chloride were provided with suitable facilities for quick drenching of flushing of the eyes in the work area for immediate emergency use.  b. On or about February 19, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employees in the chemical storage room, who were exposed to corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to, hydrofluoric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, sodium hypochlorite, and ferric chloride were provided with suitable facilities for quick drenching of flushing of the eyes in the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2785
  • — Z (S) $6963

1910.120 Q02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(2): The employer did not develop an emergency response plan for emergencies which addressed the following minimum requirements of this standard: 1910.120(q)(2)(i) through 1910.120(q)(2)(xii):  On or about February 19, 2021, the employer failed to develop an emergency response plan for emergencies which addressed minimum requirements of this standard such as personnel roles, training, and communication, emergency recognition and prevention, safe distances and places of refuge, and site security and control.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(2)(ii): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, personnel roles, lines of authority, and communication:   On or about February 19, 2021, the employer's emergency response plan did not address personnel roles or training related to the emergency response of over chlorination of the etching system or a chlorine gas leak.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(2)(iii): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere,  emergency recognition and prevention:  On or about February 19, 2021, the employer's emergency response plan did not address emergency recognition and prevention of over chlorination of the etching system or a chlorine gas leak.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(2)(iv): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, safe distances and places of refuge:  On or about February 19, 2021, the employer's emergency response plan did not address safe distances and places of refuge in response to the over chlorination of the etching system or a chlorine gas leak.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q02 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2021
Abate by
Aug 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(2)(v):The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, site security and control:  On or about February 19, 2021, the employer's emergency response plan did not address site security and control in response to the over chlorination of the etching system or a chlorine gas leak.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Roemer Industries's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345156152.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.