Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SOLBERG PRECAST & CONCRETE CUTTING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SOLBERG PRECAST & CONCRETE CUTTING, LLC in 88 CHESTNUT STREET, NEEDHAM, MA 02492 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 345180277.

Watch Solberg Precast & Concrete Cutting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Solberg Precast & Concrete Cutting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
88 CHESTNUT STREET
City
NEEDHAM
State
MA
ZIP
02492
Mailing
527 SALEM STREET, #7, LYNNFIELD, MA 01940
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2487.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR  OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were not protected from the fall and struck-by hazard posed by an inadequately engaged shackle pin.   Location:  Vacuum attachment on job site  A shackle pin used to secure a safety sling was not fully engaged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2487

1926.251 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2487.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.251(c)(1):Employers must not use improved plow-steel wire rope and wire-rope slings with loads in excess of the rated capacities (i.e., working load limits) indicated on the sling by permanently affixed and legible identification markings prescribed by the manufacturer.  Location:  Job site  The Working Load Limits for the slings used to hoist the vacuum attachment were illegible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $2487

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(2)(i):Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Jobsite:    Employees were not protected from falls of approximately 15 feet while installing precast concrete planks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  Location:  Southeast side of site  The employer did not ensure that an employee's fall arrest anchor was positioned so that the employee could not free fall more than 6 feet or contact a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3482.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Location:  Job site  The employer did not ensure that employees were adequately trained in the use of personal fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3482

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345180277.