OKLAHOMA CITY, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: MARCO RUBIO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCO RUBIO in 6929 S. SOONER, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73135 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345192009.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCO RUBIO
- Site address
- 6929 S. SOONER
- City
- OKLAHOMA CITY
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73135
- Mailing
- 1030 NW 31ST, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. On or about March 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees, performing roof work activities, were in use of fall protection. This exposed the employees to a fall hazard greater than six(6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2926
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. On or about March 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees working from an aerial lift were in use of fall protection. This exposed the employees to a fall hazard greater than six (6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2926
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345192009.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.