Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARCO RUBIO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCO RUBIO in 6929 S. SOONER, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73135 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345192009.

Watch Marco Rubio — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marco Rubio is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARCO RUBIO
Site address
6929 S. SOONER
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73135
Mailing
1030 NW 31ST, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.    On or about March 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees, performing roof work activities, were in use of fall protection. This exposed the employees to a fall hazard greater than six(6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.453(b)(2)(v):  A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift.  Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.   On or about March 11, 2021, the employer did  not ensure employees working from an aerial lift were in use of fall protection.  This exposed the employees to a fall hazard greater than six (6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345192009.