Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLAVIO LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FLAVIO LOPEZ in 4020 ROSEBUD, PROSPER, TX 75078 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345196174.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flavio Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flavio Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLAVIO LOPEZ
Site address
4020 ROSEBUD
City
PROSPER
State
TX
ZIP
75078
Mailing
1525 LOMITA DR., RICHARDSON, TX 75080
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2021
Abate by
Apr 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,053 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  On or about March 15, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees operating Hitachi nail guns while performing roofing activities were not wearing eye protection, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1053
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,487 · Current $1,492 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about March 15, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees engaged in applying roofing materials were not provided fall protection exposing employees to an unprotected fall hazard of approximately 22 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1492.2
  • — Z (S) $2487

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,487 · Current $1,492 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  On or about March 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto,  the employer did not ensure employees safely used the ladder to gain access to the residential roof.  The ladder was not secured at the top and did not extend three feet above the landing surface. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1492.2
  • — Z (S) $2487

1926.503 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2021
Abate by
Apr 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $329 · Current $197 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees  who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate  understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section:    Note:  Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where (1) Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete; or (2) Changes in the types of fall protection systems or equipment to be used render previous training obsolete (3) when inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill:    On or about March 15, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees exposed to fall hazards while engaged in applying roofing materials were not provided formal training and did not demonstrate the skills and did not show safe work practices when exposed to fall hazards.  Employees need a training program and formal retraining.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $197.4
  • — Z (O) $329

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2021
Abate by
Apr 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)Note:  29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) may be cited as an additional violation to support this requirement.   On or about March 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto,  employees were accessing the roof area using an unsafe ladder and employees did not show knowledge and understanding to recognize the hazards and eliminate them.  THe employer needs to provide a training program and formal training .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345196174.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.