FRANKLIN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: CI FOODSAN, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CI FOODSAN, LLC in 9775 SOUTH 60TH STREET, FRANKLIN, WI 53132 (NAICS 561210). OSHA activity number 345197750.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CI FOODSAN, LLC
- Site address
- 9775 SOUTH 60TH STREET
- City
- FRANKLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53132
- Mailing
- 244 E PROSPECT AVE, LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561210
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $9,557 · Current $9,557
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control. (a) At the workplace located at 9775 South 60th Street, Franklin, WI 53132, the employer failed to provide authorized employee training on Strauss Brands Vemag machine prior to employees engaging in sanitation processing contracted by CI Foodsan.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9557
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $9,557 · Current $9,557
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence: 29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6) (a) At the workplace located at 9775 South 60th Street, Franklin, WI 53132, the employer did not ensure employees implemented energy control procedures prior to entering the point of operation of Strauss Brands Vemag machine to perform sanitation processing contracted by CI Foodsan. The machine was not isolated from all energy sources prior to engaging in these servicing and maintenance activities. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lock-out/tag-out device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910.147(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from the unexpected energization, startup, or release of stored energy during machine servicing and maintenance activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9557
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation: The employer did not complete column (E) and complete column (F) of their 2020 and 2021 Form 300 completely in that: (a) Case No. 1 (02/11/2020), did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill. (b) Case No. 2 (04/15/2020), did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill. (c) Case No. 3 (06/03/2020), did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill. (d) Case No. 4 (07/15/2020), did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill. (e) Case No. 5 (02/18/2021), did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $6,827 · Current $6,827
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2):Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA. (a) On or about February 18, 2021 the employer failed to report a finger amputation to OSHA within the 24 hours of the incident taking place.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $6827
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561210)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345197750.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.