Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CI FOODSAN, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CI FOODSAN, LLC in 9775 SOUTH 60TH STREET, FRANKLIN, WI 53132 (NAICS 561210). OSHA activity number 345197750.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CI Foodsan, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CI Foodsan, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CI FOODSAN, LLC
Site address
9775 SOUTH 60TH STREET
City
FRANKLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53132
Mailing
244 E PROSPECT AVE, LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561210
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2021
Abate by
Aug 30, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $9,557
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.    (a) At the workplace located at 9775 South 60th Street, Franklin, WI 53132, the employer failed to provide authorized employee training on Strauss Brands Vemag machine prior to employees engaging in sanitation processing contracted by CI Foodsan.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $9557

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2021
Abate by
Aug 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $9,557
29 CFR  1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence:   29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6)  (a)  At the workplace located at 9775 South 60th Street, Franklin, WI 53132, the employer did not ensure employees implemented energy control procedures prior to entering the point of operation of Strauss Brands Vemag machine to perform sanitation processing contracted by CI Foodsan. The machine was not isolated from all energy sources prior to engaging in these servicing and maintenance activities.  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lock-out/tag-out device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910.147(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from the unexpected energization, startup, or release of stored energy during machine servicing and maintenance activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $9557

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2021
Abate by
Aug 11, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:  The employer did not complete column (E) and complete column (F) of their 2020  and 2021 Form 300 completely in that:  (a) Case No. 1 (02/11/2020),  did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.  (b) Case No. 2 (04/15/2020),  did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.  (c) Case No. 3 (06/03/2020),  did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.  (d) Case No. 4 (07/15/2020),  did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description of the injury/illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.  (e) Case No. 5 (02/18/2021),  did not provide a description of where the event occurred; did not provide a description the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2021
Abate by
Aug 11, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,827 · Current $6,827
29 CFR  1904.39(a)(2):Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.  (a) On or about February 18, 2021 the employer failed to report a finger amputation to OSHA within the 24 hours of the incident taking place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $6827

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345197750.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.