Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HECTOR MANUEL HERNANDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HECTOR MANUEL HERNANDEZ in 1707 CEDAR BLUFF, MANSFIELD, TX 76063 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345204176.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hector Manuel Hernandez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hector Manuel Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1707 CEDAR BLUFF
City
MANSFIELD
State
TX
ZIP
76063
Mailing
1835 PARKER ROAD, ARLINGTON, TX 76012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.   At the jobsite, employees were not wearing hardhats while working below other employees that were installing framing material to a residential house, exposing employees to struck-by hazards from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   At the jobsite, employees operating Paslode nail guns while performing framing activities were not wearing eye protection, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.    At the jobsite, employees engaged in framing activities at a height of over 6 feet were not protected by a fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to an unprotected fall of over 20 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1052 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge:   At the jobsite, the stairs leading to the second floor were not equipped with handrails, exposing employees to the hazard of falling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 30, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  At the jobsite, employees performing framing activities were not provided fall protection.  The employer did not provide a training program with hazard recognition and avoidance training where part of the job is to be exposed to fall hazards at a heights over 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345204176.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.