CALERA, AL —
OSHA Inspection: RV ROADWAY AND ROADWAY COLLISION CENTER, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RV ROADWAY AND ROADWAY COLLISION CENTER, INC. in 1405 ALABAMA 87, CALERA, AL 35040 (NAICS 441210). OSHA activity number 345207443.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RV ROADWAY AND ROADWAY COLLISION CENTER, INC.
- Site address
- 1405 ALABAMA 87
- City
- CALERA
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35040
- Mailing
- 1405 ALABAMA 87, CALERA, AL 35040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441210
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,901 · Current $3,901
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided fall protection when exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet or greater when working on the top of recreational vehicles.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3901
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,340 · Current $2,340
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, a written respiratory protection program had not been developed and implemented for employees required by the employer to wear 3M half-face respirators when engaged in activities such as, but not limited to, spray painting.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2340
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about March 22, 2020 - Facility, the employer did not ensure that medical evaluation was provided to employee(s) required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, 3M half-face respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, the employer did not ensure that employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, 3M half-face respirator were fit tested.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,340 · Current $2,340
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication for chemicals used such as, but not limited to, Evercoat 4:1 Polyester Primer Catalyst, AkzoNobel Lesonal Basecoat SB, and Kardol 2K Urethane Primer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2340
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Collision Shop, Safety Data Sheets (SDS) were not maintained for chemicals such as, but not limited to Evercoat 4:1 Polyester Primer Catalyst, AkzoNobel Lesonal Basecoat SB, and Kardol 2K Urethane Primer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about March 22, 2021- Collision Shop, the employer did not ensure that employees working with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Evercoat 4:1 Polyester Primer Catalyst, AkzoNobel Lesonal Basecoat SB, and Kardol 2K Urethane Primer were trained.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,340 · Current $2,340
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, forklift operators were not provided formal and practical forklift training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2340
1910.22 B
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(b): The employer did not ensure that each walking-working surface can support the maximum intended load for that surface: (a) On or about March 22, 2021 - Facility, the employer did not ensure that the storage area above the Service Office was not overloaded.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441210)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345207443.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.