NEW CANAAN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: LIMA ROOFING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LIMA ROOFING LLC in 954 PONUS DRIVE, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345218366.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LIMA ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 954 PONUS DRIVE
- City
- NEW CANAAN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06840
- Mailing
- 74 DEVILS GARDEN ROAD, NORWALK, CT 06850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. Jobsite: The employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns to install roofing shingles were not provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048.2
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b)(a). Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working from the roof of the residential building under renovation were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048.2
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 7, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on a roof at a height above 6 feet from the ground were provided with training and information to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize and/or eliminate such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345218366.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.