BRUNSWICK, ME —
OSHA Inspection: BRAD FREEMAN & SON CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRAD FREEMAN & SON CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 4 AND 6 EMANUEL DRIVE, BRUNSWICK, ME 04011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345232243.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRAD FREEMAN & SON CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 4 AND 6 EMANUEL DRIVE
- City
- BRUNSWICK
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04011
- Mailing
- 19 HEFFRON LANE, GEORGETOWN, ME 04548
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- May 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i):Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: Ladder Jack Scaffold - The two employees 16 feet above the ground were not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Roof - The two employees 18 feet above the ground were not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 11, 2021
- Abate by
- May 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Ladder Jack Scaffold - The extension ladder did not extend 3 feet above the scaffold platform.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- May 11, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: Worksite - The Employer did not develop a written fall hazard training certification.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345232243.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.