Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GONZALO OROZCO

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GONZALO OROZCO in 1100 S. MITCHELL, MANSFIELD, TX 76063 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345233753.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gonzalo Orozco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gonzalo Orozco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GONZALO OROZCO
Site address
1100 S. MITCHELL
City
MANSFIELD
State
TX
ZIP
76063
Mailing
4312 COLLEGE AVENUE, FORT WORTH, TX 76115
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2):  A respirator was not provided by the employer to each employee when such equipment was necessary to protect the health of the employee: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    At the jobsite, employees who were cutting masonry stone with a Dewalt Masonry cutting saw were not protected with personal protective equipment and exposed to respiratory hazards from the dust, silica dust and particles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.   At the construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees were wearing hardhats while working below other employees. Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  At the job site, employees were not provided eye protection when operating a Dewalt masonry saw cutting bricks and were exposed to eye injuries from flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii).  At the construction site, employees were working on a welded frame scaffold that was not fully planked. The employees performing masonry activities were exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  At the construction site, employees were working on a welded frame scaffold without ladder access. The employees performing masonry activities on the ground below were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.  At the construction site, employees were working on a welded frame scaffold without guardrails. The employees performing masonry activities were exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  At the construction site, employees were working on a welded frame scaffold without fall protection training. The employees performing masonry activities on the ground below were exposed to being struck by material falling from above and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.   At the construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees using a Dewalt masonry saw to cut bricks were protected from being exposed to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2021
Abate by
Apr 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:   At the residential construction site, the employer did not assess the exposure for employees using a Dewalt masonry saw to cut bricks. Employees were potentially exposed to silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345233753.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.