DELAWARE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MIKE BENAVIDES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIKE BENAVIDES in 3628 ELLARY CT LOT 2681, DELAWARE, OH 43015 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345236871.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIKE BENAVIDES
- Site address
- 3628 ELLARY CT LOT 2681
- City
- DELAWARE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43015
- Mailing
- 1713 LINNET AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,463 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer did not initiate and maintain a safety and health program to ensure hazard detection and correction when four employees conducted sheathing work on a new build residential home.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1463
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer failed to instruct employees on the avoidance of unsafe conditions while they conducted framing work at a new build residential home.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects shall not be used to support scaffolds or platform units. a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the platform was properly supported when framing lumber was used to support the modified working platform on top of the ridge of the rooftop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers. Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part. 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold shall be protected by a personal fall arrest system; a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employees who worked on top of the ladder jack scaffold were protected from falling. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13 and 15 feet respectively to the ground level without the use of the personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): Effective September 2, 1997, the employer shall have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds. Employers are required to provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds where the installation and use of such protection is feasible and does not create a greater hazard. a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer did not have a competent person to determine the safety and feasibility for fall protection when employees erected the ladder jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or about April 07, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that an employee was protected from falling when sheathing work was done on top of the steep pitched 5/12 rooftop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345236871.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.