STAMFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: RODRIGUEZ PAINTING, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RODRIGUEZ PAINTING, LLC in 57 STILLWATER AVENUE, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 345261747.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RODRIGUEZ PAINTING, LLC
- Site address
- 57 STILLWATER AVENUE
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 20 DEPINEDO AVENUE 2ND FLOOR, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $329 · Current $329
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 57 Stillwater Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b with a final order date of 10/12/2021 was not received within 10 calendar days ( by 8/21/2021) following the abatement due date (8/11/2021).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $329
1926.501 B14
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were taping drywall near wall openings were protected from fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while taping drywall near the unprotected wall openings were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 B01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(b)(1): Foot traffic was not prohibited on stairways where the treads and/or landings of pan stairs were to be filled in with concrete or other material at a later date and stairs were not temporarily fitted with wood or other solid material at least to the top edge of each pan. Jobsite: The employer did not prohibit the employees from using the stairway from the first to the third floor which had stair pans that were not filled and exposed the employees to slips and trips.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1755
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail. Jobsite: The employer did not prohibit the employees from using the stairway from the first to the third floor which had no handrails and exposed the employees to slips and trips.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345261747.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.