MARLBOROUGH, NH —
OSHA Inspection: W E BROWN ROOFING INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of W E BROWN ROOFING INC in 96 MAIN ST., MARLBOROUGH, NH 03455 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345262083.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- W E BROWN ROOFING INC
- Site address
- 96 MAIN ST.
- City
- MARLBOROUGH
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03455
- Mailing
- 78 VICTORIA STREET, KEENE, NH 03431
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part such as a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment and work rules was not developed and/or implemented at the job site. Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the employer had not initiated and maintained accident prevention programs to eliminate fall hazards, scaffolding collapse hazards and other construction related hazards for the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the employer did not perform regular and frequent inspections by a competent person to identify potential construction hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the scaffolding in use at the jobsite had not been inspected by a competent person prior to the work shift to determine if there are structural integrity deficiencies such as where there were pins missing from the frames to prevent uplift, some footings were not level and were partially displaced off of their mudsills and there was no guard railing installed on the work platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the scaffolding in use by employees did not have footings that were level, sound and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without displacement where there were footings that were not level and others that had displaced and were partially overhanging their mudsills.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.452 C04
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(4): End frames of tubular welded frame scaffolding were not locked together vertically by use of pins or equivalent means in areas where uplift could occur: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the end frames of the fabricated frame scaffolding in use by employees were not locked together vertically by the use of pins or equivalent means.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, employees were not protected from falling over 13 feet to a lower level where guard rails or a personal fall arrest system were not used on the fabricated frame scaffolding in use at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 G01 III
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(iii):Each employee on a crawling board (chicken ladder) was not protected by a personal fall arrest system, a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound top rail capacity), or by a three-fourth inch (1.9 cm) diameter grab line or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside each crawling board: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the crawling board (chicken ladder) set up for use onsite did not have a three-fourth inch diameter grab line or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside it where the roof eave was over 13 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 M01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(m)(1): Crawling boards did not extend from the roof peak to the eaves when used in connection with roof construction, repair, or maintenance: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the crawling board installed and available for employee use did not extend from the roof peak to the eave, falling approximately 3 feet short of the eave.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1):Employer did not ensure that employees while on a scaffold are trained by a qualified person on ways to minimize hazards in the work area: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, employees were not trained in the hazards of working from a fabricated frame scaffold without fall protection, where the fall was greater than thirteen feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the employer did not provide training to employees in the recognition of fall hazards and procedures to eliminate them where employees were exposed to falls of over 13 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site - On or about April 21, 2021, two employees engaged in residential roofing activities over 13 feet above the ground were not protected from falling where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site - On or about April 21, 2021, the access ladder to the scaffolding was short of the minimum 3 feet by approximately six inches where the ladder extended a little more than two rungs spaced at one foot each.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections at W E Brown Roofing INC
View W E Brown Roofing INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345262083.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.