Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MOLAMARK CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MOLAMARK CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 22 OCEAN RIDGE BLVD N., PALM COAST, FL 32137 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 345274633.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Molamark Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Molamark Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
22 OCEAN RIDGE BLVD N.
City
PALM COAST
State
FL
ZIP
32137
Mailing
1501 ABSHER ROAD, SAINT CLOUD, FL 34771
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $2,731 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1):Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds shall be fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as follows:  a.   On the second through fifth levels of the scaffold system, at 22 Ocean Ridge Boulevard North in Palm Coast Florida:  On or about April 15, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employees of subcontractor Isel Herrera were not exposed to a fall hazard up to 32 feet, in that the decking was not fully planked, leaving gaps between the scaffold sections.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2730.5
  • — C (S) $5461
  • — Z (S) $5461

1926.451 B08

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(8):At all points of a scaffold where the platform changes direction, such as turning a corner, the platform that rests on a bearer at an angle other than a right angle was not laid first:  a.    On the fourth and fifth levels of the front exterior scaffold system, at the northwest corner, at 22 Ocean Ridge Boulevard North in Palm Coast Florida: On or about April 15, 2021, the employer failed to ensure employees of subcontractor Isel Herrera were not exposed a fall hazard from loose planking of up to 32 feet fall hazard when performing stucco work, in that the plank placed at the corner at a 45 degree angle was not laid first on the bearers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(xv):Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces is between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform.  The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart.  a.   On the second through fifth levels of the exterior scaffold system, over the front entrance, at the front of the house, at 22 Ocean Ridge Boulevard North in Palm Coast Florida:  On or about April 15, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employees of subcontractor Isel Herrera were not exposed to a fall hazard of up to 32 feet length of the scaffold, in that a fall protection system, such as but not limited to, a complete guardrail system, to include a mid-rail and top-rail, was not properly utilized as the employees performed stucco work.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2021
Abate by
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a.  On the exterior scaffold system, at 22 Ocean Ridge Boulevard North in Palm Coast Florida:  On or about April 15, 2021, and at times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain such programs for employees as may be necessary to comply with this part, which addressed the following basic elements: 1. Identification and Control of Hazards 2. Hazard Analysis
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2021
Abate by
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a):The employer shall have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   a.  On all levels of the exterior scaffold system, at 22 Ocean Ridge Boulevard North in Palm Coast Florida: On or about April 15, 2021, and at times prior, the employer did not train employees who erected and worked from scaffold systems to recognize and minimize hazards associated with scaffold systems.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Molamark Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345274633.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.