PLAIN CITY, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: PEDRO ARLIAGE
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PEDRO ARLIAGE in 7527 BARRISTER WAY, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345276307.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEDRO ARLIAGE
- Site address
- 7527 BARRISTER WAY
- City
- PLAIN CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43064
- Mailing
- 5030 SULLIVANT AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or about April 28, 2021, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to address hazards such as fall protection during roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4096
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a. On or about April 28, 2021, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):"Unprotected sides and edges." Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a. On or about April 28, 2021, employees were performing framing work on a two story residential home without protecting the stairway and the open edges of the second floor with a guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard of more than 15 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or about April 28, 2021, employees were performing roofing work on a two story residential home without the use of fall protection; the employee was working on the roof at elevated heights of over 15 feet, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4096
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345276307.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.