Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO ARLIAGE

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PEDRO ARLIAGE in 7527 BARRISTER WAY, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345276307.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pedro Arliage for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Arliage is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PEDRO ARLIAGE
Site address
7527 BARRISTER WAY
City
PLAIN CITY
State
OH
ZIP
43064
Mailing
5030 SULLIVANT AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2021
Abate by
Aug 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about April 28, 2021, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to address hazards such as fall protection during roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4096

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2021
Abate by
Aug 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or about April 28, 2021, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2021
Abate by
Aug 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):"Unprotected sides and edges." Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a. On or about April 28, 2021, employees were performing framing work on a two story residential home without protecting the stairway and the open edges of the second floor with a guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard of more than 15 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2021
Abate by
Aug 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about April 28, 2021, employees were performing roofing work on a two story residential home without the use of fall protection; the employee was working on the roof at elevated heights of over 15 feet, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4096

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345276307.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.