BRADENTON, FL —
OSHA Inspection: PERMACAST LLC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of PERMACAST LLC. in 6015 21ST STREET EAST, BRADENTON, FL 34203 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 345291702.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PERMACAST LLC.
- Site address
- 6015 21ST STREET EAST
- City
- BRADENTON
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34203
- Mailing
- 6015 21ST STREET EAST, BRADENTON, FL 34203
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $13,653 · Current $12,288 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards: a) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 4, 2021, employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards while working in the lateral moving path of precast walls, suspended by an overhead crane, during the opening of molds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12287.7
- — Z (S) $13653
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $8,192 · Current $5,734 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): a) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed a 9.5 feet fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not provided to employees walking on top of the molds 1 through 7 during hoisting operations such as, but not limited to, wall demolding and concrete pour.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5734.4
- — Z (S) $8192
1910.28 B11 II
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $6,827 · Current $4,779 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements. a) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed fall hazards, in that midrails were missing on both sides of the stairs used to access molds 1 and 2. b) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed fall hazards, in that midrails were missing on both sides of the stairs used to access molds 5 and 6.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4778.9
- — Z (S) $6827
1910.29 B10
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $6,827 · Current $4,779 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(10): The employer did not ensure that when guardrail systems are used at hoist areas, a removable guardrail section, consisting of a top rail and midrail, are placed across the access opening between guardrail sections when employees are not performing hoisting operations: a) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed a 9.5 feet fall hazard when walking on top of the molds after a concrete pour, in that a midrail was not used on the north and south sides of wall molds 1, 2, 5 and 6. b) At the wall molds area of the plant, on or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed a 9.5 feet fall hazard when walking on top of the molds after a concrete pour, in that a midrail was not used on the north side of wall molds 3, 4 and 7.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4778.9
- — Z (S) $6827
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,867 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed inhalation hazards, in that, a respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented for employees required to use an N95 filtering face piece or a half-face respirator with particle filters during grinding of precast walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2867.2
- — Z (S) $4096
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed inhalation hazards, in that, medical evaluations were not completed for employees required to use an N95 filtering face piece or a half-face respirator with particle filters during grinding of precast walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) On or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed inhalation hazards, in that, employees were not fit tested prior to using an N95 filtering face piece or a half-face respirator with particle filters during grinding of precast walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): a) On or about May 04, 2021, employees were exposed inhalation hazards, in that, training was not provided to employees required to use an N95 filtering face piece or a half-face respirator with particle filters during grinding of precast walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Permacast LLC.
View Permacast LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345291702.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.