NAPOLEON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: PANDROL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PANDROL, INC. in 25 INTERSTATE DRIVE, NAPOLEON, OH 43545 (NAICS 336510). OSHA activity number 345293658.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PANDROL, INC.
- Site address
- 25 INTERSTATE DRIVE
- City
- NAPOLEON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43545
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 69 ATTN: TRISHA ROSS, NAPOLEON, OH 43545
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336510
- Employees
- 57
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $10,728 · Current $5,364 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about May 6, 2021, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a N95 filtering facepiece respirator before requiring the use. The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators while mixing paste and cleaning on the second level above the core machines to protect against potential exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5364
- — Z (S) $10728
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about May 6, 2021, the employer did not provide a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators. The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against respirable crystalline silica while mixing paste and cleaning on the second level above the core machines.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): On or about May 6, 2021, the employer did not provide employees with effective training on why the respirator is needed and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator, how to check the seal of the respirator, when to replace the respirator. The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators while mixing paste and cleaning on the second level above the core machines to protect against potential exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 J03 I
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $13,653 · Current $4,552 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the following: (A) the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (B) specific tasks in the workplace that could result in exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (C) specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica, including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used; (D) the contents of this section; and, (E) the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (i) of this section: On or about May 6, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the core and paste areas of the facility with potential exposure to respirable crystalline silica were provided effective training on the hazards associated with exposure, job tasks which could result in exposure, controls in the workplace to limit exposure, and the contents of the OSHA respirable crystalline silica standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4552
- — Z (S) $13653
More inspections at Pandrol, INC.
View Pandrol, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336510)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345293658.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.