Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEONEL LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEONEL LOPEZ in 3001 S. HIGH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43207 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345307250.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leonel Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leonel Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEONEL LOPEZ
Site address
3001 S. HIGH STREET
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43207
Mailing
58 MIDLAND AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2021
Abate by
Sep 10, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a.	On or about May 13, 2021 at 3001 S. High Street in Columbus, Ohio, employees were framing and setting trusses on a three story multifamily building without fall protection exposing the employees to an approximately 30 foot fall.  b.	On or about May 13, 2021 at 3001 S. High Street in Columbus, Ohio, employees are exposed to fall hazards when accessing the two walkways between the left middle and right sections of the second floor, approximately 10 feet from the ground.   c.	On or about May 13, 2021 at 3001 S. High Street in Columbus, Ohio, employees are exposed to fall hazards when accessing the two walkways between the left middle and right sections of the third floor, approximately 20 feet from the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345307250.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.