Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COMARCO PRODUCTS OF FL LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COMARCO PRODUCTS OF FL LLC in 7100 PRC WAKY, PALATKA, FL 32177 (NAICS 311991). OSHA activity number 345326284.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Comarco Products of FL LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Comarco Products of FL LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7100 PRC WAKY
City
PALATKA
State
FL
ZIP
32177
Mailing
7100 PRC WAKY, PALATKA, FL 32177
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311991
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,106 · Current $3,319 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:   a. At the facility, at or near the spiral freezer conveyor area: On May 8, 2021,  the employer developed a written energy control procedure for "All Equipment", however, the employer did not enforce or utilize the energy control procedure as employees routinely climbed a ladder in close proximity to a conveyor chain and sprocket assembly, thereby bypassing a guarded by distance method, to unjam the conveyor, which exposed employees to moving machine parts and in-going nip points.   In the alternative, 29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3318.9
  • — Z (S) $5106

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345326284.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.