Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ONYX BLASTING AND COATING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONYX BLASTING AND COATING, LLC in 1129 FOREST STREET, MARSHFIELD, MA 02050 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 345327076.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Onyx Blasting and Coating, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Onyx Blasting and Coating, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1129 FOREST STREET
City
MARSHFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
02050
Mailing
2309 FLORIDA BOULEVARD, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:   Jobsite:  Employees were operating a JCB Model 507-42 rough terrain forklift prior to completing required training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2048
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 D03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $3,202 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(3)(i):  Before the scaffold was used, direct connections were not evaluated by a competent person to confirm, based on the evaluation, that the supporting surfaces are capable of supporting the loads to be imposed: Jobsite:  Employees were engaged in painting the top section of a water tower approximately seventy (70) feet above the ground from a suspension scaffold that was not inspected prior to use by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3202
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:  Jobsite:  Employees engaged in reconditioning a water tank greater than seventy (70) feet high from a suspended scaffold were not using personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  Jobsite:  Employees were using a suspended scaffold system more than seventy (70) feet above the ground without being trained in recognition of hazards associated with the use of this scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $3,202 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Jobsite:  An employee was working on the top of a water tank more than seventy (70) feet above the ground without proper fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3202
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite:  Employees working at heights greater than seventy (70) feet above the ground from suspended scaffolding and the top of the water tank were not trained in the use and selection of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 A19 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(a)(19)(iii): Fixed ladders provided with cages or wells, with multiple ladder sections had ladder sections which exceeded 50 feet (15.2 m) in length:  Jobsite:  A fixed ladder equipped with a cage used to access the top of the water tank was greater than fifty (50) feet without rest platforms or offset sections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2048
  • — Z (S) $4096

View Onyx Blasting and Coating, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345327076.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.