MARSHFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ONYX BLASTING AND COATING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONYX BLASTING AND COATING, LLC in 1129 FOREST STREET, MARSHFIELD, MA 02050 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 345327076.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ONYX BLASTING AND COATING, LLC
- Site address
- 1129 FOREST STREET
- City
- MARSHFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02050
- Mailing
- 2309 FLORIDA BOULEVARD, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562910
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: Jobsite: Employees were operating a JCB Model 507-42 rough terrain forklift prior to completing required training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 D03 I
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $3,202 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(i): Before the scaffold was used, direct connections were not evaluated by a competent person to confirm, based on the evaluation, that the supporting surfaces are capable of supporting the loads to be imposed: Jobsite: Employees were engaged in painting the top section of a water tower approximately seventy (70) feet above the ground from a suspension scaffold that was not inspected prior to use by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3202
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.451 G01 II
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: Jobsite: Employees engaged in reconditioning a water tank greater than seventy (70) feet high from a suspended scaffold were not using personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: Jobsite: Employees were using a suspended scaffold system more than seventy (70) feet above the ground without being trained in recognition of hazards associated with the use of this scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $3,202 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Jobsite: An employee was working on the top of a water tank more than seventy (70) feet above the ground without proper fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3202
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: Employees working at heights greater than seventy (70) feet above the ground from suspended scaffolding and the top of the water tank were not trained in the use and selection of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 A19 III
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(19)(iii): Fixed ladders provided with cages or wells, with multiple ladder sections had ladder sections which exceeded 50 feet (15.2 m) in length: Jobsite: A fixed ladder equipped with a cage used to access the top of the water tank was greater than fifty (50) feet without rest platforms or offset sections.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
More inspections at Onyx Blasting and Coating, LLC
View Onyx Blasting and Coating, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562910)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345327076.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.