Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO LUGO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO LUGO in 153 CAMELIA, GARLAND, TX 75043 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345330583.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Lugo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Lugo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANTONIO LUGO
Site address
153 CAMELIA
City
GARLAND
State
TX
ZIP
75043
Mailing
5416 FLETCHER AVE, FORT WORTH, TX 76107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1):Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used.  On or about May 26, 2021. employees were exposed to electric shock when using electric cords were worn when operating circular saw.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2021
Abate by
Aug 2, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.   On or about May 26, 2021 employees were performing framing work on a residential house roof approximately 9 feet in height without the use of fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345330583.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.