AUSTIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: PRINTEDD PRODUCTS
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PRINTEDD PRODUCTS in 2400 FORBES DRIVE SUITE 100, AUSTIN, TX 78754 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 345335178.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRINTEDD PRODUCTS
- Site address
- 2400 FORBES DRIVE SUITE 100
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78754
- Mailing
- 2400 FORBES DRIVE, AUSTIN, TX 78754
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D05 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(5)(i): Flammable liquids were stored so as to limit use of exits, stairways, or areas normally used for the safe egress of people. On or about May 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, a 55-gallon drum containing a flammable chemical was stored approximately 2-feet from an emergency exit, limiting the use of the exit for safe egress, and exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5803
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $8,192 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. On or about May 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, no assessment had been performed to determine what Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was required to protect employees in the workplace, exposing employees to the hazards of inhaling or coming into contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $8192
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. On or about May 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not provided eye wash stations for employees required to use corrosive chemicals, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck-by hazardous chemicals in their eyes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5803
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $8,192 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii). On or about May 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, multiple employees were using hazardous chemicals on printing press machinery without the employer's development or implementation of a written Hazard Communication Program, exposing employees to various chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $8192
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $652 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible. On or about May 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, a UV press operator employee was allowed to voluntarily wear a tight fitting half-face respirator without having been provided basic information regarding respirator safety, exposing the employee to the hazards of increased physiological burden and aggravation of a cardiac or pulmonary disorder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $652
More inspections at Printedd Products
View Printedd Products's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345335178.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.